I just finished reading an article (link here) from the McKinsey Quarterly that summarized a survey of CEOs. The survey was about CEOs perspective on the social and environmental responsibility of corporations. The bulk of CEOs surveyed believed that it is important for their companies to be socially and environmentally responsible in order to be successful going forward. Juxtaposing this against the rhetoric of the recent election, I am having a hard time understanding why the government would want to continue to impose stricter regulation on companies who are trying to clean up their act? It seems to me that political candidates are trying to exploit the public sentiment that CEOs can easily recognize by examining their bottom line. What I am trying to say is that I think politicians are trying to take credit for what businesses are already trying to do because people are concerned about the environment and those politicians want to be perceived as the heroes. Shouldn’t government be encouraging businesses to “go green” instead of punishing them for not? It is all too reminiscent of the old carrot-and-stick idiom.
November 10, 2008
“Greenwashing” Government?
Posted by danielst3 under MGT | Tags: Business, corporate responsibility, environment, ethics, green, Politics, social justic, society |[2] Comments
December 9, 2008 at 10:11 pm
Tom,
Don’t you know that all CEO’s are greedy, upper-class, rich, white, power-hungry mongers? They don’t…I mean can’t care about the environment and social issues because they all, by common definition, equal the aforementioned things. They’re all mean-spirited scrooges who don’t like Tiger Woods playing in Augusta, Georgia. If they did care about the environment and social justice, then it would be too confusing – rich people caring for others…absurd! If you have a rich person who cares about others and the environment (I think we both know at least a couple of these people), then the corner, which the Democratic party thought they owned (i.e. social issues and environment) has a viable and efficient competitor. Therefore, it’s just easier to negatively stereotype all CEO’s as rich, white, and Republican. Ironically, (or maybe it’s just human nature like the Bible says) no person is exempt from craving more and more. The longing for power, money, (fill in the blank) will never go away. The person/family/group without it will long to be the person/family/group with it, and seek it in often subconscious ways (viz. demonizing the other, wooing the masses with eco-friendly and politically correct language). The point is this, CEO’s cannot be non-white and generous because that would diffuse certain political battle lines. Battle lines preserve (even demand) identity. And identity provides stability. And stability is a human necessity.
Jesus makes perfect sense.
December 9, 2008 at 10:17 pm
Jon – you nailed it. It’s all about politics. You can’t be the hero without a villain, and you can’t get re-elected without being a hero.